February 28, 2010

New Device Aims to Curb Distracted Driving

A new high-tech device represents an early – though almost certainly not the last – attempt to solve the problem of distracted driving via technology. An application called “Textecution” can, when installed on a compatible smartphone, disable texting, email and web surfing functions while the owner is driving.

According to the tech site TMC News the application is currently available only for handsets running Google’s Andriod operating system, though versions for other platforms are anticipated. The site reports that the application is being marketed to parents as a way to promote safer driving habits among teens. A number of studies in Oregon and nationwide have shown distracted driving – specifically texting or talking on the phone while behind the wheel – to be a growing problem. The legislature has sought to crack down on Oregon distracted driving by banning texting by Oregon drivers, as well as the use of phones without a hands-free device.

As TMC points out, in its early form Textecution has some bugs that may need to be worked out. It reportedly uses a phone’s GPS capabilities to determine whether the phone is in a moving vehicle. That does not, however, make it capable of distinguishing between a phone whose owner is driving the car and one whose owner is merely sitting in the passenger seat (or riding on a bus).

Still, it seems likely that as is so often the case in the world of personal technology a clunky early version will be followed within a year or two by something that does the same thing much more efficiently. It also is an indication of the seriousness with which citizens and policy-makers alike are coming to view Oregon distracted driving (were there no perception that people are taking the issue seriously there would be no incentive for software developers to try to find a market).

Even with technology striving to help fix this problem, the legal system remains a significant deterrent to dangerous behavior. If you or a loved one has been the victim of a Portland distracted driver, consulting with an Oregon distracted driving accident attorney should be a top priority. Even if the police have not cited one party to an accident for Oregon driving and texting, if such behavior played a role in the accident you may be entitled to significant compensation to replace lost wages and salary, or to help with medical bills.


TMC News: Textecution Disables Texting, Email and Web Browsing While Driving

January 26, 2010

Transportation Department Bans Texting By Bus & Truck Drivers

In another sign of the speed with which distracted driving has gone from a fringe issue to center stage, the US Department of Transportation moved Tuesday to ban bus drivers and drivers of large trucks from texting while operating their vehicles, according to media reports. The measure will exist above and beyond the Oregon distracted driving law that went into effect this month.

The New York Times reports that the ban is effective immediately and that violators will “face civil or criminal fines of up to $2,750.” Here in Oregon distracted driving, including texting and the use of hand-held cellphones behind the wheel, has been illegal since the first of the year. Similar bans exist in about a dozen other states as well as the District of Columbia. The federal government is able to go beyond these state laws because of the authority it possesses to regulate the trucking industry at the national level.

In addition to cellphones the new rules also cover the dashboard computers long-haul drivers use to communicate with their dispatchers. The move comes partly in response to an increasing body of statistical evidence of the dangers posed by distracted driving. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has been an increasingly vocal opponent of distracted driving since taking office last year.

The new regulations should also benefit drivers who have been involved in a Portland traffic accident involving an Oregon distracted driver. As laws aimed at distracted driving tighten up throughout the nation, it may become increasingly difficult for reckless drivers to justify their conduct in court. Pedestrians, motorists and cyclists injured by an Portland distracted driver should promptly consult a Portland personal injury lawyer. Beyond the criminal sanctions an Oregon distracted driver may be subject to, victims in such accidents may also be entitled to compensation for their injuries, damage to vehicles, lost income and pain and suffering.


New York Times: Government bans texting by truck and bus drivers

Reuters in Insurance Journal: U.S. bans texting by drivers of large trucks, buses

January 20, 2010

Oregon Gets High Rating From Highway Safety Group

Oregon’s new distracted driving law helped earn the state the state a ‘Green Light’ – the highest rating – in the annual report card issued by Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. For 2009 the group added a ban on texting while behind the wheel to its list of recommended state-level legal and safety measures. Oregon’s distracted driving law, which bans texting, was signed into law in 2009 and came into force this year.

Overall, Advocates judged states by the number and strength of 15 different legal areas associated with highway safety. Oregon was one of ten states (plus the District of Columbia) to earn the ‘Green Light’ designation.

Rising awareness of Oregon distracted driving and other highway safety issues was a key feature of the state’s politics last year. As the new law takes effect it raises separate questions about how it will be enforced by the state’s courts and what that may mean for drivers or pedestrians injured by an Oregon distracted driver.

If you have been involved in an accident involving a Portland, Salem or Corvallis distracted driver it is important to make contact with an Oregon personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. A Portland auto accident lawyer can help you obtain the compensation you deserve for injuries caused by a driver who was not paying enough attention to the road.


Tucson Citizen: Report card on highway safety shows more states fail, fall under more pointed scrutiny; Safety advocates call for urgent state action in 2010

January 2, 2010

Oregon Distracted Driving Law Takes Effect

With the stroke of midnight and the beginning of 2010 Oregon joined the growing list of states restricting the use of cellphones by people driving cars. In Oregon and around the country distracted driving has emerged over the last two or three years as a serious issue of public concern. The interesting question may, in fact, be why it took so long for this to happen. As the New York Times link below indicates, concern about the issue is not particularly new. AAA issued its first warning that drivers ought to pull over before picking up the phone in 1984 (yes, 1984).

Oregon’s new distracted driving law requires drivers to use a hands-free device, such as a Bluetooth headset, when making and receiving calls. Telephone use by drivers under the age of 18 is banned entirely. Also banned (for drivers of all ages) is texting while behind the wheel. More details about the new law can be found here.

While there have been a number of media reports during the last few weeks of brisk headset sales around Oregon, it will probably take some time before the real impact of the Oregon distracted driving law becomes clear. Anecdotal evidence from other states with distracted driving laws indicates that enforcement regimes vary widely (for example: New York, one of the first states to enact a distracted driving law, has a reputation for relatively relaxed enforcement while Washington DC is said to be unusually strict).

The fact that Oregon now restricts distracted driving may also make the issue the subject of more civil actions around the state. If you have been injured by someone who was inappropriately using a cellphone behind the wheel, consulting with a Portland distracted driving lawyer should be among your top priorities. Even if the police have not issued a criminal citation to an Oregon distracted driver you, as the victim, may be entitled to a substantial settlement.


Salem Statesman-Journal: ‘Hang up and drive’ starts Friday

New York Times Interactive: Timeline: The Selling of the Cellphone

December 29, 2009

Oregon Distracted Driving Law’s Loopholes Raise Questions

The new Oregon distracted driving law that comes into effect Friday has been getting a lot of attention over the last week. This weekend, however, the state’s leading newspaper raised serious questions about whether the law already contains a fatal flaw.

An editorial in the Portland newspaper The Oregonian points out that the Oregon distracted driving law requiring drivers to use a hands-free device if they are talking on the phone while behind the wheel contains an exception for people “operating a motor vehicle in the scope of a person’s employment if operation of the motor vehicle is necessary for the person’s job.” The paper says the language was inserted at the insistence of business lobbyists, but worries that “necessary for a person’s job” is not defined anywhere in the legislation.

The loophole, the paper notes, “may well be big enough for real estate agents, contractors, FedEx drivers and just about anyone who needs a car for work.” Interpretation of the provision will lie with Oregon’s courts, and it may take some time for legal judgments under the new law to offer Oregon distracted driving attorneys guidance on what “necessary for the person’s job” means in practice.

The uncertainty likely to surround the new distracted driving law makes consulting with a Portland distracted driving attorney especially important if you are facing distracted driving charges brought under the new law, or have been the victim of an accident in which you believe the other party may have been in violation of Oregon’s cell phone ban. An Oregon distracted driving lawyer can be a key ally if you find yourself forced to navigate what, for Oregonians, is still relatively uncharted legal territory.


The Oregonian: A New Year’s Resolution on Cell Phones

December 12, 2009

Is Oregon Distracted Driving Everyone Else’s Problem?

On January 1 Oregon joins the ranks of states banning texting while driving as well as the use of a hand-held cellphone. A recent blog and accompanying discussion on the New York Times website, however, asks an intriguing question for Oregon distracted drivers: are you willing to acknowledge that your own behavior behind the wheel is a problem?

The Times cites a recent survey conducted by the AAA Foundation. As the paper paraphrases the results: “essentially, many people believe, ‘I can do it safely, but you’re a menace.’” This attitude, of course, is hardly confined to the question of telephone use. How many people do you know who are actually willing to say ‘I’m a bad driver’?

Examining this attitude is especially timely. Though the new Oregon distracted driving law allows for primary enforcement (i.e. the police can pull you over just for talking on a cellphone – they will not need to look for some other initial violation, such as speeding or driving recklessly) the fine for violating the law will be relatively low ($90). Moreover, in most states that already have these laws few people, in practice, get ticketed just for using a phone.

Legally speaking, of course, the answer is that Oregon distracted driving is – and ought to be – everyone’s problem. Distracted drivers make the road less safe for all of us. That is why civil liability is so important here. Above and beyond the criminal sanctions coming into force next month, people who drive while texting or talking on a handset need to know that they are exposing themselves to significant Oregon personal injury liability. A Portland distracted driving lawyer can help you recover the damages you deserve if you have been injured by an Oregon distracted driver.

Take the new law to heart both in your own driving, and in considering, after an accident, whether an Oregon personal injury lawyer can help you get the compensation to which you may be entitled.


New York Times: Do multitasking drivers have double standards?

November 27, 2009

Highlighting Oregon Distracted Driving Dangers

A timely reminder for this holiday weekend comes from USA Today travel columnist Bill McGee. His headline says it all: “Distracted While Driving? Pull Over!” The law, as he notes, is only part of the issue. Oregon is among the growing number of states that have banned texting and use of hand-held cellphones while driving. But it is worth remembering that aside from endangering yourself, your passengers and everyone else on the road distracted driving can leave you open to a significant Oregon personal injury judgment if a court finds you liable for an Oregon personal injury accident. As I’ve noted elsewhere on this blog, such a finding can take place even if the police do not issue a citation at the scene of the accident.

McGee cites some sobering statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, such as the fact that “distraction was a factor in 12% of all fatal crashes in 2004, but rose to 16% in 2008.”

The good news is that recognition of the problem is widespread. An Insurance Information Institute survey last summer found that 80% of respondents supported a ban on texting while driving. For handheld cellphone use the figure was 67%. Even allowing for the fact that an insurance industry survey might be tilted toward a ban (texting leads to more crashes; more crashes lead to more claims), the logic behind the data is hard to argue with.

If you have been the victim of a Portland traffic accident injury and think the driver involved may have been distracted it is crucial to seek the advice of an Oregon personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Even forms of distracted driving that are still, technically, legal may under some circumstances be construed as negligent for the purpose of a civil court case. An Oregon personal injury lawyer with expertise in distracted driving issues can offer advice and guidance and help you obtain the compensation you deserve.


USA Today: Distracted While Driving? Pull Over!