When Jail Becomes a Death Sentence: Medical Neglect and Civil Rights Violations in Multnomah County

by

KAPLAN LAW

When Jail Becomes a Death Sentence: Medical Neglect and Civil Rights Violations in Multnomah County

Every person booked into the Multnomah County Detention Center or Inverness Jail is, in the eyes of the law, presumed innocent. Most have not been convicted of anything. Many are awaiting arraignment, unable to post bail, or held on charges as minor as a probation violation or a shoplifting allegation. What they share is a constitutional guarantee: the government that holds them also owes them a basic, enforceable duty of care. When that duty is ignored, the result is not just a policy failure. It can be a civil rights violation, and it can be fatal.

A Pattern, Not an Isolated Incident

On January 8, 2025, 46-year-old Carlos Morris died inside the Multnomah County Detention Center. He had been arrested six days earlier, accused of stealing $139.98 worth of nicotine gum. According to the county medical examiner’s report, Morris was going through opioid withdrawal, and the night before he died, jail staff noted he was “minimally responsive” and “appeared to be covered in urine and feces.” His official cause of death was listed as complications of severe diarrhea, a recognized and often preventable consequence of untreated withdrawal.

Morris’s case did not happen in isolation. In August 2025, 51-year-old Chad William Scott was booked into the Inverness Jail and found unresponsive less than 24 hours later. He did not survive, and as of this writing, the medical examiner has not publicly released his cause of death, a reminder that these cases often take months to resolve and that families are left waiting for answers about how their loved one died in the state’s custody. In December 2025, 42-year-old Shristika Nath died at the Inverness Jail during what the sheriff’s office described as a medical event. Multnomah County recorded five in-custody deaths in 2025, compared to a single death in all of 2024. The pattern has continued into 2026: a 65-year-old man booked into the Multnomah County Detention Center in February died in March following a medical emergency at the jail, and this past week brought two more. On August 18, a 71-year-old man booked four days earlier was found unresponsive in his cell at the Detention Center and pronounced dead. Two days later, on August 20, a 48-year-old man who had been in custody at the Inverness Jail since August 16 died early that morning after what the sheriff’s office called a medical event. Officials said the two deaths were unrelated and that neither involved use of force, drugs, or suicide.

A 2024 external review of the jail system, conducted by corrections expert Margaret Severson at the sheriff’s office’s own request, had already identified serious health care and operational deficiencies, including poor coordination between departments, understaffing, and inconsistent practices that put people in custody at risk. The county’s own sheriff acknowledged there were significant areas that needed to be addressed. The deaths that followed suggest those warnings were not fully heeded.

The Legal Standard: Why “Accused” Changes Everything

For someone serving a sentence after conviction, a claim of inadequate medical care is analyzed under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. But most people in county jail have not been convicted of anything. They are pretrial detainees, and the Constitution treats them differently. Their claims arise under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, because the government has no legal authority to punish someone who has only been accused.

In the Ninth Circuit, which governs Oregon, pretrial detainees bringing medical neglect claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 benefit from an objective unreasonableness standard rather than the higher bar of proving a jail official’s subjective intent. Under this framework, established in Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2018), a family does not need to show that a deputy or nurse wanted harm to come to a detainee. They need only show that the response to a known medical need was objectively unreasonable given the circumstances, and that this failure caused the harm. When the failure reflects a broader pattern, such as chronic understaffing or ignored withdrawal protocols, the county itself can face liability under Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), for a policy or custom of deliberate indifference.

What Families Can Do

Oregon law requires that claims against a public body like Multnomah County follow the Oregon Tort Claims Act. For wrongful death claims, ORS 30.275(2)(a) requires formal notice within one year of the death. Missing that window can permanently bar a claim, which is why families who suspect medical neglect contributed to a loved one’s death in custody should act quickly to preserve records, request the medical examiner’s findings, and consult an attorney before evidence is lost or deadlines pass.

Anyone Can Be the Next Name in This Story

The through-line in these cases is not criminal history. It is what happens after someone is placed in a cell and their medical needs are handed off to a system that may be stretched too thin to respond. A missed medication, an unmonitored withdrawal, an unanswered call for help: these are the kinds of failures that can turn a minor charge into a death in custody. Being accused of a crime does not waive a person’s right to survive their time in jail.

If you have lost a loved one in a Multnomah County jail and believe medical neglect played a role, Kaplan Law’s Jail Death and Civil Rights practice area can help you understand your rights and options under Oregon law.

 

Legal Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different, and the outcome of any legal claim depends on its specific facts. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Kaplan Law.

Sources

Legal Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different, and the outcome of any legal claim depends on its specific facts. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Kaplan Law.
50 SW Pine St 3rd Floor Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 226-3844 Fax: (503) 943-6670 Email: matthew@mdkaplanlaw.com
map image
Contact Information
50 SW Pine St
#302
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone: (503) 226-3844 Fax: (503) 943-6670 Email: matthew@mdkaplanlaw.com

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Kaplan Law, LLC
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design