Oregon Injury Lawyer Blog

An Oregon traffic accident near Gladstone took the life of a 60-year-old pedestrian over Thanksgiving weekend. Police issued no citations at the site of the accident on McLoughlin Boulevard, but are still investigating.

The Portland fatal pedestrian accident took place Friday evening. According to local media reports, Maria Isabel Cervantes-Gutierrez of Milwaukie, Oregon was attempting to cross State Route 99E Friday evening when she was struck by a van in the southbound lane. The driver remained on the scene and has reportedly been cooperating with police. Cervantes-Gutierrez was taken to a hospital in Portland where she later died of her injuries. Police closed the southbound portion of McLoughlin for about two hours as they worked to reconstruct the Portland pedestrian accident scene.

If you or a loved one have been involved in an Oregon pedestrian accident of this type it is important to contact a Portland pedestrian accident attorney as soon as possible. Oregon pedestrian accidents can create civil as well as criminal liability. Consultation with a Portland traffic accident lawyer can help you sort out the issues involved.

In this instance, for example, the fact that the police did not issue a citation at the accident site does not, by itself, mean the driver cannot be sued for Oregon wrongful death. An experienced Oregon personal injury attorney can help you and your family sort through issues like these.

Sources:
Oregon City News: Woman dies crossing McLoughlin Boulevard

The Oregonian: Woman hit and killed while crossing McLoughlin Boulevard near Gladstone

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Pedestrian Accidents

Bookmark:

A fascinating article in The Oregonian last week spotlights an oft-overlooked Portland premises liability issue. The article details how a local non-profit group, Southwest Trails, has spent years creating walking trails throughout the Portland area. Most of the time these trails run along streets. In a few cases, however, they cut through city owned easements behind houses.

When the trails go through an easement they are not supposed to be improved (by, for example, adding a staircase) without both a city building permit and the permission of the adjacent property owners. Property owners could, according to the paper, incur Oregon property liability for accidents on a staircase or path abutting their homes. As the article details, however, it has recently emerged that Southwest Trails often failed to obtain the necessary clearances for its work – and that until recently the city never enforced the requirement for permits.

The issue is an especially serious one because of the liability issues to which property owners might be exposed. When someone is injured on public property, or on a public easement, a Portland premises liability attorney should be consulted immediately to see whether a case exists under Oregon personal injury law.

According to The Oregonian, city codes say adjacent property owners are not responsible for maintaining staircases and other improvements to easements. The city, however, does not maintain these and has balked at assuming liability for the walking trails. It notes that when Portland tried to shift liability to trail users the city attorney issued an official opinion rejecting the proposal.

The paper reports that work on the walking trails has stopped for the moment. Southwest Trails plans to resume work soon – this time with the required permits – but is still hoping that the city will assume Oregon premises liability for the trails.

The Oregonian: Fight over trail stairs has larger repercussions for Portland residents

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Premises Liability

Bookmark:

A timely reminder for this holiday weekend comes from USA Today travel columnist Bill McGee. His headline says it all: “Distracted While Driving? Pull Over!” The law, as he notes, is only part of the issue. Oregon is among the growing number of states that have banned texting and use of hand-held cellphones while driving. But it is worth remembering that aside from endangering yourself, your passengers and everyone else on the road distracted driving can leave you open to a significant Oregon personal injury judgment if a court finds you liable for an Oregon personal injury accident. As I’ve noted elsewhere on this blog, such a finding can take place even if the police do not issue a citation at the scene of the accident.

McGee cites some sobering statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, such as the fact that “distraction was a factor in 12% of all fatal crashes in 2004, but rose to 16% in 2008.”

The good news is that recognition of the problem is widespread. An Insurance Information Institute survey last summer found that 80% of respondents supported a ban on texting while driving. For handheld cellphone use the figure was 67%. Even allowing for the fact that an insurance industry survey might be tilted toward a ban (texting leads to more crashes; more crashes lead to more claims), the logic behind the data is hard to argue with.

If you have been the victim of a Portland traffic accident injury and think the driver involved may have been distracted it is crucial to seek the advice of an Oregon personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Even forms of distracted driving that are still, technically, legal may under some circumstances be construed as negligent for the purpose of a civil court case. An Oregon personal injury lawyer with expertise in distracted driving issues can offer advice and guidance and help you obtain the compensation you deserve.

USA Today: Distracted While Driving? Pull Over!

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Distracted Driving

Bookmark:

The New York Times reports today that the two doctors leading the NFL’s study of concussions and other head injuries have quit following charges that they do not take evidence of mounting long-term brain injuries among professional football players sufficiently seriously. It is a development with resonance for those battling Oregon traumatic brain injuries.

As the paper notes, one of the doctors, Ira Casson, has been a member of the league’s committee on brain injuries since 1994 and has co-chaired the committee since 2007. According to the paper, “Casson has been the league’s primary voice discrediting all evidence linking football players with subsequent dementia.” He has recently been criticized both by the families of former NFL players and by members of Congress.

At issue, and of interest to those of us outside the world of professional football, is whether the accumulation of repeated, more minor, head injuries can add up to a traumatic brain injury over time. One need not take the sort of punishment football players endure every week to be in a situation where the sum of many concussions is greater than the damage done by the individual parts.

The issue of Oregon traumatic brain injuries has also been on the local agenda here in the Portland area during 2009. This summer the governor signed an Oregon traumatic brain injury bill mandating that insurers cover medically necessary cognitive therapy for those suffering from Oregon traumatic brain injuries. Another law signed at the same time mandates education for high school football coaches in the hopes of cutting down on Oregon traumatic brain injuries at the high school level.

Despite the new legislation, the ongoing debate in the NFL highlights the extent to which brain injuries remain a subject of controversy. A Portland traumatic brain injury lawyer can help you or your loved ones sort through the changing legal landscape and claim the damages to which you are entitled if you believe you or a member of your family has suffered an Oregon brain injury.

CNN: NFL needs help in policy to deal with dangerous concussions

New York Times: NFL head injury study leaders quit

Resource:
Brain Injury Association of Oregon

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Traumatic Brain Injuries

Bookmark:

An obscure provision being debated today in the US Senate could have a major effect on Oregon medical malpractice. If approved, it could become easier for Portland medical malpractice attorneys to help clients win the compensation they deserve.

The proposal, championed by Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, would repeal the WWII era McCarran-Ferguson Act, which exempts both health insurers and medical malpractice insurers from antitrust law. Though the proposal has received little publicity, it recently got a boost when ten state attorneys general, including Oregon’s John Kroger, wrote Leahy (who chairs the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee) urging approval of the repeal. When debate on the health care bill began in the Senate Saturday morning Leahy was among the first speakers and devoted his remarks to the proposal.

According to Leahy, and the attorneys general, repeal of the exemption would allow the government to crack down on “flagrant anti-trust violations, including price-fixing, bid rigging and market allocations.” The attorneys general’s letter called for repeal of the exemption to make “antitrust enforcement the same here as for virtually all other industries, enhancing competition to the benefit of consumers.”

By introducing competition into the Oregon medical malpractice market the measure would also make it easier for consumers to sue the insurance companies. A practical consequence of the antitrust exemption is that Oregon medical malpractice and other insurance companies are freed from competitive pressure, making it harder for injured consumers, assisted by an Oregon medical malpractice lawyer, to take them on in court.

VermontBiz: Ten state attorneys general back Leahy’s health insurance antitrust exemption repeal

Resources:
Oregon Attorney General’s Website

Senate Judiciary Committee Website – Documents Section

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Medical Malpractice

Bookmark:

This may not come as a huge surprise, but a new survey indicates that teens are still texting while driving, despite a rising number of state bans across the country, including a newly enacted one here in Oregon.

The new survey data, compiled by Pew Research, was released this week, according to the tech news website CNET. In July Oregon became the 16th state to ban texting while driving, a practice that is pretty much universally acknowledged to be extremely dangerous. Oregon car accidents leading to serious injuries or death are far more likely to occur when a driver is talking on a cellphone or texting. This includes single and multi-car Oregon auto accidents as well as Oregon pedestrian accidents.

The Pew survey indicated that one-third of 16 and 17 year old drivers admitted to texting while driving (one was quoted as saying he wears sunglasses while texting “so the cops don’t see” him looking down). A full 48 percent of passengers age 12 to 17 said they had been a car while the driver was texting. Portland car accidents involving a texting driver can be especially serious, and may expose the driver to liability even from passengers in his or her own vehicle. A Portland personal injury lawyer specializing in Oregon cellphone-related car accidents can advise on the best way to approach a car accident lawsuit.

CNET: Survey: Third of teens text while driving

Resource:
Governors Highway Safety Association

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Motor Vehicle Accidents , Personal Injury

Bookmark:

The federal government is taking aim at energy drinks that mix alcohol and caffeine, a move that might have an effect on Oregon personal injury lawsuits. As reported by both the New York Times and the Associated Press, the Food and Drug Administration recently sent letters to 30 drink manufacturers challenging them to prove that their products are safe, or else it will “take appropriate action to ensure that the products are removed from the marketplace.” The government is giving the drink makers 30 days to demonstrate that their products are safe.

The FDA was acting in response to a letter of concern signed by 17 state attorneys general, the Attorney General of Guam and San Francisco’s City Attorney. Oregon’s attorney general was not among the signers, but a federal move to pull the drinks from shelves would effect the entire country and could create product liability in Portland and elsewhere in the state under Oregon’s personal injury laws.

According to the Times, FDA scientists worry that the drinks can lead to increased risks of serious injuries among their users, who skew heavily toward college students. The drinks mixture of alcohol (usually malt liquor) and caffeine can lead users to underestimate just how drunk they are. The drinks often provide, as the newspaper put it, “a false sense of confidence that they can perform tasks they are too impaired to undertake.”

These dangerous drinks can create Oregon product liability and lead to Portland personal injuries or even an Oregon wrongful death. Some manufacturers appear to be aware of this. In the last year Anheuser-Busch has removed the caffeine from its flavored malt beverages and MillerCoors has stopped selling products like this entirely, according the Associated Press. Such moves, however, do not necessarily exempt the drink makers from liability were a Portland wrongful death to occur through the use of their products.

Even though Oregon’s attorney general has not become directly involved in this issue, an Oregon personal injury and product liability lawyer can offer advice and assistance if you believe you or a loved-one has been involved in an accident in which caffeinated energy drinks were a factor.

New York Times: F.D.A. Says it May Ban Alcoholic Drinks With Caffeine

AP (republished at Huffington Post): FDA Questions Safety of Alcoholic Energy Drinks

FDA statement announcing its investigation

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Products Liability

Bookmark:

Following up a story I blogged about last month (see my October 22 entry), developments in the Oregon shooting death of Portland hunter Frank Means have led his family to announce that they will initiate an Oregon wrongful death claim against his killers.

Means was found shot to death near the town of Fossil, along the John Day River, on October 8. The Oregon State Police became involved in the investigation after Means’ widow criticized the conduct of the local sheriff’s office. Investigators eventually concluded Means’ death was the result of a dispute with other hunters. According to a report in The Oregonian Means, who had been drinking (an autopsy put his blood alcohol level at 0.24 percent), believed another hunting party was attempting to steal a deer he had shot. Means threatened the other hunters with a handgun, shot back when they attempted to disarm him, and was then killed by gunshots from at least two of the other hunters. Last week, a Wheeler County grand jury refused to hand down charges against Means’ killers, ruling that they acted in self-defense.

Oregon Public Broadcasting reported afterwards that Means’ widow was “devastated” by the news and has hired an Oregon wrongful death attorney, intending to file a civil Oregon wrongful death lawsuit. “I just can’t understand that when somebody is shot five times that a grand jury could find that it was justified,” Jackie Means told OPB. “My husband was a wonderful guy, and he may have been drunk out there, but he was in his own campsite. I am having a real difficult time with this.”

Oregon wrongful death claims can include compensation for pain and suffering, loss of income, loss of companionship and reimbursement for medical and/or funeral expenses. An experienced Portland wrongful death lawyer can help guide you through the process and advise on the strength of your claim, always remaining sensitive to the emotional distress of the loss of your loved one.

Oregon Public Broadcasting: Hunter’s Family is ‘Devastated’ by Grand Jury Decision

The Oregonian: No criminal charges in fatal shooting of Portland hunter near John Day River

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

An Oregon bicycle accident last week is the best reminder in a long, long while of why a helmet ought to be essential biking gear. The Salem bicycle injury accident took place when an 18 year old swerved to avoid an SUV pulling out of a fast-food restaurant. The Salem bike rider was thrown over her handlebars as she tried to avoid the SUV, which then ran over her head with its rear tire, according to a detailed report in The Oregonian, quoting Marion County law enforcement officials.

The newspaper reports that the cyclist was taken to a hospital but released a short time later without serious injuries. Her helmet, however, “was pretty much crushed” according to a Marion County sheriff’s office spokesman. Oregon law requires helmets for riders 16 and under. In this case it is clear that wearing a helmet saved the 18 year old bike rider, sparing her serious personal injury or death as a result of her Salem bicycle accident.

Even when cyclists take every necessary precaution, however, Portland personal injury accidents involving bicycles and cars can be especially serious. While this story had a happy ending, it also highlights the importance of wearing a bike helmet at all times. When injuries do occur as the result of an Oregon bicycle accident involving a car or SUV, consulting a Portland bicycle injury attorney should be near the top of your post-accident priority list. Collisions, especially those involving negligence, may entitle the victim to compensation for medical bills, long-term care, damage to property, lost wages and pain and suffering.

The Oregonian: In Praise of bike helmets

Seattle Times: Helmet saves Oregon rider

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Bicycle Accidents

Bookmark:

A 29-year old woman was involved in a Hillsboro pedestrian accident recently while making her way through the parking lot at Sunset Esplanade. The Hillsboro auto accident took place in the late afternoon moments after the victim had exited a bus and as she was heading across the parking lot on the shopping complex’s north side, according to a report in the Hillsboro Argus.

The car struck the woman as she moved through the parking lot at what a police spokesman later described as “a jogging pace”. The woman was thrown onto the hood of the car, hitting its windshield. The police spokesman told the Argus that the victim of the Oregon car and pedestrian collision was taken to an area hospital with a broken back, but that she was not paralyzed as a result of the accident.

Parking lots, with their restricted sight lines and drivers who are not always proceeding as cautiously as they should, can be especially dangerous for pedestrians. Portland traffic accidents in parking lots can lead to serious injuries, or death. If you have been struck by a car in a parking lot consulting with a Portland personal injury lawyer should be a top priority.

Even if police opt not to issue a citation to the car’s driver that does not mean the person who hit you is exempt from civil liability. Recovery of medical bills, compensation for pain and suffering and even punitive damages may be in order, depending on your personal situation. Consultation with a Portland traffic accident attorney is the first step toward assuring that your rights are protected.

The Hillsboro Argus: Pedestrian crossing parking lot injured by car at Sunset Esplanade

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Motor Vehicle Accidents , Pedestrian Accidents

Bookmark:

A Portland traffic accident left one woman dead and another in critical condition over the weekend, according to a report from local TV station KGW. The Portland fatal accident took place at the corner of SE 80th Street and Foster Boulevard early Sunday evening, according to police.

The TV station, quoting police sources, reported that the two women were hit while crossing the street at a poorly-lit intersection that has a dangerous reputation among area residents. Police say the two women were in a clearly marked crosswalk, but that the driver probably had trouble seeing them in the dark. The driver is reported to be cooperating with police.

An accident like this can give rise both to Oregon wrongful death claims and to Oregon personal injury claims for surviving victim. Consulting with a Portland wrongful death lawyer who is also experienced in Portland personal injury law is essential at the earliest feasible moment after an accident.

KGW reported that the victims in this case were roommates who lived only half a block from the accident scene and were on their way home from a parking lot at the time. The fact that they knew the area well, but still became Portland pedestrian accident victims attests to the dangerous nature of the intersection where the accident occurred.

“Hopefully this will be a wake-up call for the city to do something more about lighting and control in this intersection,” one area resident told KGW after the Oregon fatal pedestrian accident.

KGW: Woman dies after being hit by car in Portland crosswalk

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Pedestrian Accidents

Bookmark:

A Portland hit-and-run accident involving a single car and a pedicab driven by a six-foot tall orange rabbit (yes, you read that correctly) ended in a mixed Portland car accident verdict last week, according to a report in The Oregonian.

Kate Altermatt was pedaling the cab through Portland last Easter Sunday, dressed for the holiday, when a driver trying to recover a dropped cellphone hit her. Altermatt testified that the driver offered her money when she confronted him following the Portland injury traffic accident but when she smelled alcohol on his breath and refused the cash he drove away. A Multnomah County Circuit Court found Edward Cespedes-Rodriguez guilty of hit-and-run driving. He faces up to one year in jail and is scheduled to be sentenced later this month. He was cleared of a reckless endangerment charge stemming from the pedicab driver’s allegation that when Cespedes-Rodriguez hit her a second time he did so on purpose.

While a trial involving a six foot tall, pedicab driving, orange rabbit sounds like something from a TV program, the larger issues at stake are deadly serious. Hit-and-run driving is dangerous as well as illegal. Victims of a Portland hit-and-run accident should consult a Portland personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Criminal charges, such as the ones the driver faced in this case, do not address injury claims. As the victim of an Oregon hit-and-run you may be entitled to monetary damages.

Compensation for Oregon accident victims may include restitution for lost wages, damage to property, medical bills and pain and suffering. Every situation is unique, but an experienced Portland car accident lawyer can guide you through the process.

The Oregonian: Hit-and-run driver claimed he didn’t see 6-foot-tall orange rabbit on the pedicab

Posted by Matthew D. Kaplan | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Car Accidents , Personal Injury

Bookmark: